Reviewer’s Feedback Copy

Please briefly comment on whether the learning objectives meet the three criteria below. If you think one of them does not, mention that one specifically.

1. measurable and/or observable (It is possible to ask questions to assess them).
2. behavioral (they describe things you can do as opposed to just “understanding a concept” or “being aware of something.”)
3. describe a skill or knowledge the participant will be able to demonstrate after completing the course

Learning Objectives:

1. Establish a clear criterion A event for the diagnosis of PTSD

2. Appropriately use criterion A in the assessment of clusters B – H

3. Explain key differences of re-experiencing symptoms of trauma survivors with and without PTSD

4. Explain key disorders to differentially diagnose PTSD

5. Discuss two ways to be trauma sensitive when assessing victims of trauma

The learning outcomes were related to the course content.

The course organization was clear and made the content easy to follow

The technology was used effectively in presenting the material (e.g., the presentation format, having audio and video, etc.)?

Describe how the course instructor tried to make the course interactive, that is, were there questions he asked, things he wanted you to think about during the presentation, examples he gave, assessments to test your understanding, etc.?

Say if the interactive aspects above were used effectively as well.

Comment on whether the instructor was  . . .

1. knowledgeable
2. clear
3. used course-appropriate technology to support participant learning

What is your highest level of education (e.g., Master of Social Work, Master’s of arts in professional counseling)?

The supporting materials (these are the downloadable materials: article and further reading reference guide and PDF of the PTSD Checklist -5) were  . . . .

1. accurate
2. match the level of course material (beginning, intermediate, advanced)
3. extend the learning

What format was the course you took (pre-recorded webinar, live webinar, podcast, in-person presentation)?

These questions ask you about the course evaluation (the assessment of the participant’s experiences and opinions about the course – not the post-knowledge test). You can download the course evaluation in the course materials section.

Check the box if the course evaluation did the following. You can check as many boxes as you want.

The course content is focused on one or more of the following social work educational areas (select all that apply).

Any recommendations for post test development or additional content for this course?

Check the boxes of all the items below that apply to the post-course knowledge assessment (not the course evaluation).

Did this course effectively addresses the issues presented?

What are you licensed as? (social worker, psychologist, marriage and family therapy, etc).

Was the course technology (audio-video format of the presentation, online tests, powerpoint slides) helpful for participant learning, user-friendly, responsive to participants?

Overall rate the quality of the course technology: (0=lowest 5=highest)
Explain your rating.

How many minutes did it take you to complete this course?

The following issues related to disability were identified (at the beginning of the presentation) and addressed. Please identify how we asked people to address their accommodations.

This is from slide 4
Create Meaningful Change, Inc. is committed to ensuring the highest quality learning experience from all audience members, including those with cognitive, social, emotional, hearing, visual, mobility disabilities, and we fully comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the ethical guidelines of APA, ASWB, and NBCC. All trainees seeking accommodation under section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 et seq. or the Americans with Disabilities Act must contact us by emailing [email protected], and include a description of the disability and how it impacts learning. If you’re taking this training and you need accommodations, we’ll do our best to help you out.

How many CEs are assigned to this course?

Do you have any other recommendations or observations about the training?

Given the length of the course, the amount of material covered, the complexity of material, and level of the course (this is supposed to be an intermediate course), is 1 CE a fair number of credits? Please explain why or why not.

Were the post-test questions clearly related to the course material, at the right level of difficulty (not too easy or too hard), and a reasonable number for a one-credit course?

At what level is the course content: beginning, intermediate, or advanced practitioners. Beginning (introductory material), Intermediate (adds to knowledge of practitioners with some experience), Advanced (addresses complex issues for experienced professionals working in an area)